1. Institutional reforms
- Restore the rule of law
- Strengthen separation of powers
- Depoliticise state institutions
Zimbabwe's political system has been caught in repeated crises: disputed elections, executive dominance and institutional decay. From the 2008 Government of National Unity to the 2017 military intervention, elite-driven settlements have brought temporary stability but not lasting reform.
By 2025, the erosion of public trust, continued economic collapse and the marginalisation of civic and diaspora voices had produced renewed calls for a structured transition. The Forum's answer is the National Transitional Authority (NTA).
A temporary, reform-focused administrative structure designed to:
Its limited lifespan addresses fears of a parallel government or an indefinite transition.
Decisions are reached by consensus, with dispute resolution built on negotiation and mediation.
The central decision-making body, with representatives of political parties, churches, labour, academia, business, youth, women and the diaspora.
These replicate the national structure in each province, for mobilisation and implementation close to communities.
Engages SADC, the AU and international partners for diplomatic support and resources.
The framework sets time-bound targets, generally within 24 months of the NTA being formed, so that progress can be measured and the transition has a clear end.
Established within 3 months, with a referendum targeted within 18 months.
Human rights and transitional justice mechanisms created.
Media and information reforms.
Legislative amendments to guarantee autonomy.
Policy and legislative overhaul.
Policy and legal inclusion within the first year.
Citizens vote on the outcome of the constitutional review.
Political, institutional and socio-economic reform in one holistic pathway.
Citizenship redefined beyond borders through the diaspora vote and broad participation.
A neutral, civic-led platform able to bridge entrenched divisions.
A limited lifespan that rules out an indefinite transition.
Consistent with SADC, AU and global governance standards.
Entrenched elites may see the NTA as a threat to existing power.
Activation needs legal amendments or a negotiated settlement under SADC oversight.
Reforms fail if security, judicial or electoral bodies stay politically controlled.
Reliance on donor and diaspora funding demands transparent finances.
Inclusive consensus can stall under deep polarisation.
Political parties agree, under SADC facilitation, to form the NTA as a caretaker reform body. The Forum serves as a technical and civic partner, not a governing actor.
The Forum builds pressure through civic mobilisation and diaspora diplomacy, prompting incremental reforms without a formal NTA.
The ruling elite rejects the framework. The Forum's role remains advocacy, with potential for repression or co-optation.
If sustained, refined and regionally endorsed, the NTA model could be Zimbabwe's most coherent roadmap toward constitutional renewal and accountable governance since the 2008 GNU.Policy Analysis ReportVenikazi Vedi Vici, Policy Analyst · 22 October 2025